Minimizing Tissue Injury and Incisions in Multilevel Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Technical Note and Preliminary Results.

Background and Objectives: Biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) is a promising technique that can be applied for the treatment of various spinal diseases. However, traditional BESS procedures require multiple, separate incisions. We present, herein, various techniques to reduce the number of incisions in multi-level surgery and their clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: Three different techniques were used to reduce the number of incisions for the preservation of normal tissue associated with BESS: the step-ladder technique, employing a common portal for the scope and instruments; the portal change technique employing a two-level procedure with two incisions; and the tilting technique, employing more than three levels. Pain (Visual Analog Scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and patient satisfaction were evaluated before and 12 months after the procedure. Results: Among the 122 cases of multilevel spine surgery, 1.43 incisions per level were employed for multilevel BESS. Pain and disability showed significant improvement. Patient satisfaction showed favorable results. Conclusions: Combining multiple techniques during biportal surgery could decrease the number of incisions needed and preserve musculature with favorable clinical outcomes.

Preoperative Dyeing Technique for Decreasing Radiation Exposure in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has many advantages, including early recovery and cosmetic preservation. However, the higher radiation exposure to physicians and patients has drawbacks. Preoperative tissue dyeing techniques are feasible options for reducing radiation exposure and procedure time, but their efficacy has not yet been evaluated. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes and reduce radiation exposure during unilateral biportal endoscopy surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective, case-controlled analysis in a tertiary hospital. Patients receiving experimental tissue dye and controls in the nondye group were compared from May 2020 to September 2021. The ipsilateral posterolateral approach (IPA) and the far lateral approach (FLA) were analyzed separately among all single-level spinal procedures without instrumentation. Operative details (operation time, improvement of back and leg pain, and length of hospital stay) and radiation exposure (dose and duration) were compared. RESULTS: A total of 88 cases were included, consisting of 64 interlaminar approaches (experimental: 33, control: 31) and 24 FLAs (experimental: 13 and control: 11). In the IPA approach, the patient and physician radiation exposure doses and duration decreased significantly. Conversely, for the FLA, only the duration of the physician exposure decreased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative tissue dyeing techniques using IPA can reduce radiation exposure for physicians and patients. However, a decrease in the duration of radiation was observed only in physicians using the FLA. The dyeing technique is effective in IPA, but the efficacy of FLA is doubtful.

Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Fenestration for Symptomatic Foraminal Tarlov Cyst.

Perineural (Tarlov) cysts are a common benign pathology in the lumbosacral area but are rarely symptomatic, even when compressing the spinal root. Despite the rarity of Tarlov cyst formation in the foramen of the spine, this type is more symptomatic than those in other sites due to the narrow space. We introduce a biportal endoscopic fenestration for symptomatic foraminal Tarlov cysts. We present the case of a 40-year-old woman experiencing radiating pain in her right lower leg for 4 years. On seeking treatment, her great toe and ankle plantar flexion power had decreased. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a cystic mass located in the L5-S1 intervertebral foramen that compressed the lumbar nerve root. Partial laminotomy was performed using a percutaneous biportal endoscopic system with a far lateral approach. An oval cystic mass of 2.6×1.1 cm was identified on high-definition images. Partial bone and foraminal ligament removal and cystic membrane fenestration were performed for nerve decompression. After decompression, the patient's motor weakness and radiating pain improved. Due to high-definition images and the minimally invasive laminotomy procedures associated with percutaneous biportal endoscopic fenestration, a foraminal Tarlov cyst was fenestrated safely, and weakness arising from radiculopathy was resolved in the current case. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(2):e125-e128.].

Impact of the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic and Related Vaccination in an Orthopedic Clinic in the United Arab Emirates: An Observational Study.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has influenced hospital visiting patterns. Although vaccination has decreased infection rates and disease severity, hospital visiting patterns and associated treatment changes related to orthopedics remain unexplored in the Middle East. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination on individual departments dealing with musculoskeletal disorders in the United Arab Emirates. Relationships between publicly available national data on the number of COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction tests and confirmed and recovered cases during May 2020-July 2021 and hospital data on the number of outpatients, inpatients, operations, and physiotherapy consultations were analyzed. In January 2021, the relationship between vaccination rate and orthopedic unit utilization was evaluated after vaccination campaign initiation. Multifactorial analysis revealed that an increased number of COVID-19-related deaths correlated with a decreased number of joint operations. Negative linear relationships were observed among confirmed and death cases with inpatient treatment and joint operation as well as recovered cases with inpatient treatment. Recovered cases with inpatient treatment and joint operation showed a positive linear relationship. Inpatient spine treatment showed a positive relationship with vaccination rates. The COVID-19 pandemic influenced orthopedic treatment in the Middle East, and vaccination campaigns facilitated inpatient spine treatment.

Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Tumor Removal and Percutaneous Stabilization for Extradural Tumors: Technical Case Report and Literature Review.

Background: Extradural spinal tumors arise from soft or bony tissues in the spine and account for majority of spinal tumors. Interest in the unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique is rising, because it can easily decompress the bony spinal canal and accommodate all open surgical instruments under endoscopic guidance. However, reports of this technique have been limited to certain diseases. This study first demonstrates the UBE technique for extradural tumor biopsy and removal, and percutaneous stabilization in a 72-year-old female patient with dramatic symptom improvement. Methods: We used the UBE technique for decompression and the percutaneous screw fixation technique for stabilization in a patient with an extradural mass compressing the thecal sac and destroying the posterior element. Under endoscopic guidance, a unilateral approach was used, and decompression and flavectomy were performed bilaterally. After decompression, tumor removal and biopsy were performed using various forceps and biopsy needles. After confirming sufficient spinal canal decompression, the screw was placed percutaneously. We evaluated the technical process of the procedure, the patient's pre- and postoperative pain (using the visual analog scale), and operative radiology and pathologic results. Results: Postoperative pain and disability improved clinically, and spinal alignment stabilized radiologically. As the pathology findings confirmed an aneurysmal bone cyst, the treatment was completed without adjuvant therapy. Conclusions: We treated an unstable spine due to an extradural tumor with the UBE and percutaneous screw techniques.

A Six-Year Prospective Comparative Study of Wide and Standard Diameter Implants in the Maxillary and Mandibular Posterior Area.

Background and Objectives: The aim of our study was to test whether wide diameter (6 mm) implants perform differently from standard diameter (4 mm) implants in terms of marginal bone level and survival rate. Materials and Methods: Our sample comprised 72 patients who underwent surgery; a total of 80 implants were placed in the maxillary or mandibular molar region. Patients were divided into two groups according to the diameter of the implant, and were followed up for six years after the final setting of the prosthetics. In the test group, 40 implants with 6-mm diameter were inserted; in the control group, 40 standard diameter implants were inserted. Using panoramic radiographs, we investigated mesial and distal marginal bone levels around the implant fixtures. Results: After the first implant surgery, three implants, including one wide diameter and two standard diameter implants, failed due to lack of osseointegration. We did not note any fixture fracture during the six-year follow-up. After loading, we observed a six-year survival rate of 97.29% with no statistically significant difference from standard diameter implants, with a survival rate of 94.87%. Conclusions: This study shows that 6-mm diameter implants may be considered in the presence of adequate alveolar ridge width in the posterior maxillary and mandibular regions.

Biportal endoscopic debridement and percutaneous screw fixation technique for spinal tuberculosis: how I do it.

BACKGROUND: Biportal endoscopy and percutaneous screw fixation are promising techniques that can be applied to treat various degenerative spinal diseases. However, these techniques for spinal tuberculosis have not been reported. METHOD: Using the biportal endoscopic technique, bilateral decompression, tissue biopsy, and granulation tissue removal were performed using the screw insertion site. Using the percutaneous fixation screw technique, posterior stabilization and sagittal angle restoration were achieved. Paraplegia and radiating pain improved neurologically. Kyphosis was radiologically restored. Spinal tuberculosis (Potts's disease) was histopathologically diagnosed. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive endoscopic and percutaneous screw technique can aid the diagnosis and treatment of spinal tuberculosis.

Stand-Alone Posterior Expandable Cage Technique for Adjacent Segment Degeneration with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: A Retrospective Case Series.

Background and Objectives: Symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is a common complication after spinal intervention, particularly interbody fusion. Stand-alone posterior expandable cages enable interbody fusion with preservation of the previous operation site, and screw-related complications are avoided. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinicoradiologic outcomes of stand-alone posterior expandable cages for ASD with LSCS. Materials and Methods: Patients with persistent neurologic symptoms and radiologically confirmed ASD with LSCS were evaluated between January 2011 and December 2016. The five-year follow-up data were used to evaluate the long-term outcomes. The radiologic parameters for sagittal balance, pain control (visual analogue scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), and early (peri-operative) and late (implant) complications were evaluated. Results: The data of 19 patients with stand-alone posterior expandable cages were evaluated. Local factors, such as intervertebral and foraminal heights, were significantly corrected (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively), and revision was not reported. The pain level (p < 0.01) and disability rate (p < 0.01) significantly improved, and the early complication rate was low (n = 2, 10.52%). However, lumbar lordosis (p = 0.62) and sagittal balance (p = 0.80) did not significantly improve. Furthermore, the rates of subsidence (n = 4, 21.05%) and retropulsion (n = 3, 15.79%) were high. Conclusions: A stand-alone expandable cage technique should only be considered for older adults and patients with previous extensive fusion. Although this technique is less invasive, improves the local radiologic factors, and yields favorable clinical outcomes with low revision rates, it does not improve the sagittal balance. For more widespread application, the strength of the cage material and high subsidence rates should be improved.

Water Dynamics in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery and Its Related Factors: An In Vivo Proportional Regression and Proficiency-Matched Study.

BACKGROUND: Stable water dynamics during endoscopic spine surgery improves the surgeon's comfort and patient's outcomes. We aimed to measure the water dynamics during spinal surgery and identify the factors that facilitate stable water dynamics. METHODS: This open-label, prospective, proficiency-matched, in vivo study included patients with single-level degenerative spinal disease. After assessing their heights and balancing the matched instrument, we measured the irrigation fluid pressure in various situations. We performed multiple regression analysis based on odds ratio (OR), confidence interval (CI), and relationships (proficiency-matched) with possible instrumental and physical characteristics. The instrumental factors were the presence and length of a rigid cannulation, and the physical characteristics were body mass index (body mass index [BMI]), skin-to-dura depth, height (interaction with BMI), and body weight (interaction with BMI). RESULTS: Of the 36 patients, 29 were included. The mean pressure of the operation cavity was 16.66 ± 9.12 cm H2O (12.25 ± 6.71 mm Hg). Water pressure with the rigid cannulation (9.41 ± 2.94 cm H2O [6.92 ± 2.16 mm Hg]) was significantly lower than that without cannulation (23.43 ± 7.57 cm H2O [17.26 ± 5.57 mm Hg], P < 0.01). Water pressure correlated with cannular length (OR = -1.08, CI = -1.79, -0.37, P < 0.01) and BMI (OR = 0.56, CI = 0.12, 0.99, P < 0.01). BMI showed a proportional relationship (r = 0.84, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: During biportal endoscopy, we suggest maintaining water pressure between 4.41 cm H2O (2.41 mm Hg) and 31.00 cm H2O (22.83 mm Hg). Compared to physical characteristics, placement of the cannula and appropriate cannula length are important factors that affect water dynamics.

Can posterior stand-alone expandable cages safely restore lumbar lordosis? A minimum 5-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar lordosis (LL) can be restored, and screw-related complications may be avoided with the stand-alone expandable cage method. However, the long-term spinopelvic changes and safety remain unknown. We aimed to elucidate the long-term radiologic outcomes and safety of this technique. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent multi-level stand-alone expandable cage fusion and 80 patients who underwent screw-assisted fusion between February 2007 and December 2012, with at least 5 years of follow-up, were retrospectively analyzed. Segmental angle and translation, short and whole LL, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope (SS), sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, and presence of subsidence, pseudoarthrosis, retropulsion, cage breakage, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), and screw malposition were assessed. The relationship between local, lumbar, and spinopelvic effects was investigated. The implant failure rate was considered a measure of procedure effectiveness and safety. RESULTS: In total, 69 cases were included in the stand-alone expandable cage group and 150 cases in the control group. The stand-alone group showed shorter operative time (58.48 ± 11.10 vs 81.43 ± 13.75, P = .00028), lower rate of PJK (10.1% vs 22.5%, P = .03), and restoration of local angle (4.66 ± 3.76 vs 2.03 ± 1.16, P = .000079) than the control group. However, sagittal balance (0.01 ± 2.57 vs 0.50 ± 2.10, P = .07) was not restored, and weakness showed higher rate of subsidence (16.31% vs 4.85%, P = .0018), pseudoarthrosis (9.92% vs 2.42%, P = .02), cage, and retropulsion (3.55% vs 0, P = .01) than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Stand-alone expandable cage fusion can restore local lordosis; however, global sagittal balance was not restored. Furthermore, implant safety has not yet been proven.

Novel Instruments for Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Full Decompression and Dural Management: A Comparative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Post-laminectomy syndrome is a common cause of dissatisfaction after endoscopic interlaminar approach. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of our two newly designed instruments for laminotomy, a dural protector attached to the scope and a knot pusher for water-tight suturing of the incidental dural tears. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a multicenter evaluation. Efficacy was quantified as the pre-to-postoperative improvement in pain (visual analog scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), patient satisfaction (modified MacNab score), and length of hospital stay. Safety was quantified by the incidence and location of dural tears, rate of revision, and radiological outcomes. Outcomes were evaluated between the control (before instrument development) and experimental (after instrument development) groups. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in leg pain in the experimental group (p = 0.03), with greater patient satisfaction in the control group (p < 0.01). There was no incidence of dural tears in the area of the traversing and exiting nerve roots in the experimental group. Water-tightness of sutures was confirmed radiologically. CONCLUSION: The novel dural protector and the knot pusher for water-tight sutures improved the efficacy and safety of decompression and discectomy; however, a prolonged operative time was a drawback.

Comparison of Reoperation after Fusion and after Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Single-Center Experience of 987 Cases.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Reoperation for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is technically challenging. Studies comparing preoperative risk factors and reoperation outcomes between spinal fusion and spinal decompression are limited. Thus this study compared fusion and decompression with respect to reoperation rates, preoperative factors related to re-surgery, and clinical outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included prospectively collected data from patients who underwent revision surgeries for degenerative LSS between May 2001 and March 2015. The reoperation rate, risk factors (proportional hazards analysis of index surgery), surgery type, main reason for revision, and final clinical outcomes (pain, quality-of-life modification, patient satisfaction, and complication rate) were analyzed and compared between the fusion and decompression surgeries. RESULTS: Among 987 cases during 13 years, 25 cases of reoperation after fusion and 23 cases of reoperation after decompression were identified, accounting for reoperation rates of 5.88% and 4.00%, respectively. Combined comorbidities (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.98 for fusion; multilevel involvement [with fusion, HR: 2.92; decompression, HR: 1.95]) were strongly correlated with preoperative demographic risk factor for each procedure. The main reason for reoperation in fusion cases was proximal junctional kyphosis (40%) and implant failure (20%), and in decompression cases, recurrent lesions (48.8%) and incomplete surgery (17.4%) An additional fusion after initial fusion and re-decompression without fusion after initial decompression were the most common surgical procedure. Back pain and patient satisfaction after fusion were better compared with those after decompression. CONCLUSION: The reoperation rate, preoperative risk factors, reason for revision, reoperation type, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and time interval between index and re-surgery were different between the primary fusion and primary decompression. A better understanding of disease pathophysiology and surgical procedure characteristics will facilitate improvement in disease management and the development of treatment strategies.

Radiologic Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction after Minimally Invasive Unilateral Laminotomy and Bilateral Decompression in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common spinal disease in older adults. Although surgical modalities are recommended in patients who are unresponsive to conservative treatment, the most appropriate minimally invasive surgical procedure for patients with LSS remains controversial. Moreover, few previous studies have focused on patient-centered outcomes with radiologic correlation. In the present study, we aimed to investigate radiologic efficacy and patient satisfaction following bilateral decompression via unilateral laminotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of radiologic efficacy and patient satisfaction in a series of surgical patients treated at our institution. We classified patients into two groups based on the primary pathology (i.e., central or lateral recess stenosis). Medical records were analyzed retrospectively for radiologic outcomes and clinical parameters including pain and changes in quality of life. Data related to outcomes were collected at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery in the outpatient clinic. RESULTS: Among the 122 patients enrolled in this study, 51 had central spinal stenosis; 71 had lateral recess stenosis. Radiologically, we observed significant improvements in the anteroposterior diameter and cross-sectional area of the dural sac (central stenosis) and the lateral width of the central canal and depth of the lateral recess (lateral recess stenosis). Two weeks and 12 months after the surgical procedure, we observed significant improvements in the extent of symptoms, patient satisfaction, and quality of life (including physical function). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach shows improved radiologic outcomes, varying based on the type of stenosis. Furthermore, patient satisfaction significantly improved regardless of the type of disease.

Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of massage chair therapy versus basic physiotherapy in lower back pain patients: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain is a chronic recurrent symptom, which can lower the patient's quality of life. With technological development of automated home massage systems, now offers a promising alternative to physiotherapy. However, thus far, the effectiveness of such methods has not been evaluated. We aimed to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a massage chair with those of conventional physiotherapy for the treatment. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial with a two-group parallel design. Following randomization and allocation, 56 participants were enrolled to receive either physiotherapy (n = 25) or mechanical massage using the massage chair (n = 31). Pain severity was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) and satisfaction assessed with the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Quality of life modification was analyzed using the Functional Rating Index (FRI). Cost-effectiveness was analyzed by comparing the sum of physiotherapy fees and monthly rental fees for chair massage. RESULTS: Physiotherapy and massage chair were both effective for pain control as assessed with the VAS (P < .001), satisfaction as assessed by MPQ (P < .001) and life quality improvement as assessed by FRI (P < .001) in both groups. Both VAS and FRI scores were significantly higher for physiotherapy than for massage chair (P = .03 and P = .03, respectively). There was no significant difference in MPQ between the two groups. Massage chair therapy was more cost-effective than physiotherapy, at only 60.17% of the physiotherapy cost (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The home massage chair system was cost-effective, but pain control and disability improved more with physiotherapy. However, our results showed that the massage chair is a promising treatment for pain control and quality of life modification, but efficacy is still superior in physiotherapy and the chair is not a replacement for physiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0003157. Retrospectively registered August 2, 2018.

Dural Tears in Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Anatomical Location and Management.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate and anatomical location of dural tears associated with spinal surgery using a percutaneous biportal endoscopic surgery (PBES) technique. We investigated the relationship between dural tears and the type of procedure and type of instrument used. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 643 PBES cases by reviewing the medical records, operative records, and operative videos. Incidental durotomy was identified in 29 cases. We analyzed the size and anatomical location of the dural tears, the surgical instrument that caused the tear, and the technique used to seal the tear. RESULTS: The dural tear incidence was 4.5% (29 of 643 cases). Tears in the exiting nerve area (2 cases; 6.9%) had mainly been caused by curettage, tears in the thecal sac area (18 cases; 62.1%) were associated with electric drill and forceps use; and tears in the traversing nerve area were associated with the use of a Kerrison punch (9 cases; 31%). Of the 29 cases of dural tear, 12 were treated with in-hospital monitoring and bed rest, 14 were treated with a fibrin sealant, 2 were treated with a nonpenetrating titanium clip, and 1 was converted to microscopic surgery. One case of postoperative meningocele after conservative treatment required endoscopic revision surgery to close the dural tear. CONCLUSIONS: Most cases of incidental dural tear during PBES were treated with an endoscopic procedure. The incidence of dural tear was no greater than that associated with microscopic surgery. Our management strategy for incidental dural tears during PBES has been shown to be safe and effective.

Trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression versus the microscopic open interlaminar approach for L5-S1 disc herniation.

Context/Objective: Trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression (SELD) is an alternative to microscopic open lumbar discectomy (OLD). SELD and OLD for L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH) have not been compared. We compared clinical results, including pain control, between SELD and OLD.Design: Retrospective analysis.Setting: Korean hospital.Participants: Eighty patients treated with SELD (n = 40) or microscopic OLD (n = 40) for L5-S1 LDH.Interventions: N/A.Outcome Measures: Clinical data were compared over 6 months. Functional status was evaluated using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, 0-100%) and time to return to work. Preoperative and postoperative pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10). Radiological assessment was performed preoperatively and postoperatively.Results: The ODI and VAS scores for leg and back pain significantly improved in both groups. At 6-months after the procedure, the average ODI decreased to 13.2 ± 11.2 from 54.5 ± 14.5 for SELD and 9.5 ± 10.4 from 57.5 ± 16.0 for OLD. The average leg VAS decreased to 1.9 ± 1.2 from 6.0 ± 1.4 for SELD and 2.3 ± 1.3 from 6.7 ± 1.6 for OLD. Back VAS reduced to 2.6 ± 1.3 from 7.2 ± 1.5 for OLD. Time to return to work was 1.1 ± 1.1 weeks for SELD and 5.4 ± 2.1 weeks for OLD. Clinical outcomes of SELD were non-inferior to those of OLD in terms of pain control.Conclusion: A scar-free procedure and early return to normal life are advantages of SELD.

Pooled analysis of unsuccessful percutaneous biportal endoscopic surgery outcomes from a multi-institutional retrospective cohort of 797 cases.

BACKGROUND: Spinal percutaneous biportal endoscopic surgery (PBES) is a minimally invasive surgery; however, it is associated with several poor outcomes. This study aimed to analyze unsuccessful PBES outcomes and verify their relationships with patient satisfaction. METHODS: From May 2015 to June 2018, PBES was performed at several institutions. Unsuccessful outcomes (reoperation and prolonged hospital stay) due to various reasons (hematoma, lesion recurrence, incomplete decompression, dural tear, instability, ascites, and infection) were analyzed. To verify the relationships between surgical experience and unsuccessful outcomes, the first 50 cases and the later cases were compared. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationships between unsuccessful outcomes and patient dissatisfaction. RESULTS: Among 866 patients, 797 cases with 1-year follow-up and complete data were analyzed. In total, 82 patients with unsuccessful outcomes were identified (10.29%). The incidences of hematoma (p < 0.04), incomplete operation (p < 0.01), and dural tear (p < 0.01) were significantly higher in the first 50 cases than in the later cases. Analyses of the relationship between unsuccessful outcomes and patient dissatisfaction showed that incomplete decompression (odds ratio (OR) 4.06), postoperative instability (OR 3.64), hematoma (OR 3.25), ascite (OR 3.25), dural tear (OR 3.02), and local recurrence (OR 2.45, 95%) contributed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Unsuccessful PBES outcomes were mostly associated with hematomas, incomplete decompression, and dural tears; instability, ascites, and infection contributed to a lesser extent. Incomplete decompression, instability, hematoma, ascite, dural tear, and local recurrence were significantly related to patient dissatisfaction. The potential for poor outcomes should be described to the patient and considered prior to surgery.

Endoscopy-Assisted Diagnosis and Revision of a Malpositioned Screw.

BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw insertion is a common procedure in spine surgery, and freehand, fluoroscopic, and robotic-assisted techniques all are used. These are indirect methods that use fluoroscopy, and direct visualization of canal involvement has not been possible. However, owing to the development of high-definition imaging modalities, delicate procedures that use endoscopy are possible. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 47-year-old man presented with severe radiating pain in his leg after undergoing L5-S1 level endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicular screw fixation. The patient then underwent an endoscopy-assisted technique for violated spinal canal and screw revision in which the misplaced screw was directly visualized using endoscopy and the trajectory of the misplaced screw was changed. With 30° endoscopy, we directly visualized the screw thread and root compression. Then with 0° endoscopy, we changed the screw trajectory inside the pedicle with an anatomic landmark. The patient's radiating pain was completely relieved after revision of the malpositioned screw. Postoperative imaging showed the revised screw trajectory inside the pedicle. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion does not require an additional incision, and early recovery after the procedure is possible. Accurate diagnosis of canal pathology and treatment are possible with direct visualization using endoscopy.

A Novel Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Technique for Symptomatic Spinal Epidural Lipomatosis: Technical Note and Case Presentations.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a minimally invasive decompression technique for symptomatic spinal epidural lipomatosis using percutaneous biportal endoscopic surgery. METHODS: In this report, we describe the indirect decompressive effect that was gained by partial laminotomy and ligamentum flavectomy under biportal endoscopic view. Direct neural decompression was then performed by removal of proliferated fat. We described the technical process and compared pre- and postoperative radiating leg pain, life quality, and a radiologic grading system of neural compression. RESULTS: This technique was performed successfully in 3 patients with idiopathic spinal epidural lipomatosis. Radiating pain was reduced, and functional disability and radiologic compression were improved. Postoperative instability and surgical complications related to the procedure were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous spinal endoscopy is a minimally invasive muscle-preserving technique for spinal lipomatosis that achieves neural decompression directly by lipoma removal and indirectly by partial bone and ligament removal.

Subtotal Resection of Cervical Dumbbell Schwannomas: Radiographic Predictors for Surgical Considerations.

OBJECTIVE: Currently, radiologic predictors for the resectability of cervical dumbbell schwannomas remain unknown. To identify radiologic predictors for resectability, we retrospectively reviewed data from 72 patients. METHODS: From January 1995 to June 2017, 72 patients who underwent surgical treatment for cervical dumbbell schwannomas were enrolled. We focused on the relationship between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features and the extent of tumor removal. The MRI features evaluated were tumor size, tumor level, Eden classification, degree of vertebral artery (VA) involvement, and signal intensity (SI) on T2-weighted images (WIs). RESULTS: Among the 72 patients, gross total resection (GTR) and subtotal resection (STR) were achieved in 37 (51.4%) and 35 (48.6%) patients, respectively. Mean maximal tumor size (P = 0.011), mean size of foraminal and extraforaminal portion (P = 0.017), tumor level (P < 0.001), VA involvement (P < 0.001), and SI on T2-WIs (P = 0.006) were significantly different between the GTR and STR groups. Univariate analyses demonstrated that maximal tumor size (odds ratio [OR]: 0.93, P = 0.012), high cervical level (OR: 11.37, P < 0.001), pushed VA (OR: 0.11, P = 0.002), encased VA (OR: 0.02, P < 0.001), and hyper-SI on T2-WIs (OR: 12.46, P = 0.020) were significant predictors for GTR. In the multivariate analysis, only high cervical level (OR: 5.48, P = 0.033) and encased VA (OR: 0.07, P = 0.014) were significant predictors for GTR. CONCLUSIONS: The resectability of cervical dumbbell schwannomas may be predicted by MRI features, including tumor size, tumor level, and degree of VA involvement.